I'm testing out, here, a new-for-me perspective. I reserve the right to walk it back if I decide it's overstated. But the more I think about it, the more gears clink into place, leaving me increasingly confident that this counterintuitive view is correct.
If you've ever advocated for a "zero tolerance" policy, you are not moderate. You are an extremist, lacking the essential human quality of restraint. And if you'd insist that there's no shame in being an extremist for What's Right, I'd remind you that every extremist who's ever lived has deemed themselves precisely that.
Restraint should not be optional. Restraint doesn't imply sympathy for bad deeds, nor for the doers. Restraint doesn't equate with weakness. Restraint is an essential faculty exercised by modern, civilized people even when (particularly when!) they're feeling scared, disgusted, or outraged. To eschew restraint is to be un-modern, uncivilized, and extreme. Staunchly unwavering conviction is not, it turns out, our best look.
Terrorists are awful. Do they deserve restraint, or shall we torture them freely? What? You oppose torture as a matter of principle? Swell! So: is that restraint an expression of weakness? Does it make you a terrorist sympathizer?
If you favor principled restraint in some realms and zero tolerance in others, you should take time to resolve this contradiction (it's a doozy; don't expect it to budge quickly). Try applying principled restraint to your pet outrages and loathings. Consider the proposition that racists, for example, might deserve human consideration just as you might insist on for a jihadist mass-murderer.
After mulling over the ramifications of mob craziness recently witnessed in several realms, I've decided I have a zero tolerance policy toward zero tolerance policies. Those who advocate them, ironically, are the same folks who preach the virtues of tolerance. We ensure a tolerant society via zero tolerance. It's the ultimate deranged endgame of The Tolerance Paradox. We have arrived.
Both feel seductively soothing to our animal brains, but nothing good comes from nationalism nor from zero tolerance. The sooner we can recognize these idealogical dead ends and move on, the better.
Thursday, December 7, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2017
(218)
-
▼
December
(47)
- The Curse, Part 9: The Mind Spins with Theories
- Rethinking Presidential Fawning
- The Curse, Part 8: Gary
- The Curse, Part 7: Countermeasure: Casper
- Slog Comments
- A Seven Year Old's Approach to Spending
- The Curse, Part 6: Countermeasure: Yoga and Medita...
- The Curse, Part 5: Countermeasure: Self-Improvement
- Four Mexican Dishes, Two Mexican Restaurants
- More Paradoxes of Brewing Tea....or Producing Anyt...
- "Cornered Rat" Report #3
- Almost Nothing is Harder Than Brewing Tea
- Christmas Thoughts
- APPL May Climb Some More
- The Curse, Part 4: Polarity Flips and Legacy Weir...
- The Curse, Part 3: The Demon Fisherman
- Helpful Words for Late-Stage Addicts
- Truth
- "Cornered Rat" Report #2
- More Good and Evil
- Farewell, Compuserve
- Parsing McCarthyism
- Massive Mac Info Dump
- Jim At Long Last Goes Home
- Check Out the "Eat Everywhere" App for Free!
- Bitcoins and Bubbles
- Killer Breakfast Scramble
- Alternative Universe Doug Jones Victory Speech
- "Cornered Rat" Report #1
- Good and Evil
- Celebration
- Presumption of Innocence is Bullshit, Man
- Got Lots of Change?
- A Prediction
- Is It Me Or Is It Them?
- My Favorite iPhone Apps
- Mobs
- Explaining the Franken Outcome
- Arguably
- Zero Tolerance
- A Novel Approach to Silencing Movie Theater Chatte...
- Everybody Lies
- My Racist Window Unit
- Gary Lucas' Astonishing Concert
- How Latin was Replaced by Italian
- Huge Dyson Vacuum Sale
- The Next One Will Be Much, Much Worse
-
▼
December
(47)
No comments:
Post a Comment