Tuesday, February 3, 2026

The Prospect of Autocracy is Not Autocracy

A Portuguese friend called America a stinking hell because we're suffering a couple thousand measles cases per year.

I pointed out that In the 1950s, before vaccine, there were over 500,000 cases per year. And the US at that moment seemed like heaven.

"Yes, but these cases now are needless!" added my friend, helpfully bringing me up to date on the awfulness of RFKJR etc., of which I was well aware.

I noted that that even this awful awfulness is still vastly less awful than the weight of 500,000 cases per year of measles back when the US seemed like heaven. A few thousand cases per year would have made 1955 Americans drop to their knees in gratitude.

But, yes, of course the stupidity and awfulness are deeply galling, and must be fought against. it's a problem to work on. But problem solving requires rationality, and we've lost all perspective. In the recent past, we were blessed to transform into spoiled princesses increasingly vexed by smaller and smaller mattress peas. And in our vexation, we are far more aggrieved and furious than any of our ancestors, who lie in their graves wagging their heads with disdain over our profound lack of appreciation for the impossible utopia in which we live....even with RFK doing horrendous things.

There are always horrendous things, but our demented reaction to them has created a vicious circle. In fact, the route to power for a RFKJR is a constituency of wealthy, comfortable, blessed people driven to dementia by the fury and grievance that inevitably accompany bored privilege. That's what fuels crazy stuff like anti-vax, which, in turn, stokes further rage. And, no, it's not a MAGA thing. My progressive, highly-educated niece refused to vaccinate her kids because she was angry and aggrieved at so-called medical authorities, etc.

Let me dare to utter the obvious truth: the prospect of autocracy is not autocracy. And the sober, non-delightful business of repelling the prospect of autocracy does not make us enslaved tormented ghouls. This push-back is something we should have been engaged in ALL ALONG. We dropped vigilance due to vast complacency from our vast blessings. We figured "participation" meant playing with our damned phones all day. The necessity to look up from those phones is an indignation that makes people frame themselves as storming the beach at Normandy against a hail of machine gun fire.

You are living in paradise. This right now is the safest, funnest, freest, most comfortable and healthy (even with the measles) moment any generation has ever enjoyed on this planet. It is a freaking miracle that we get to live at this peak, even with the lingering suboptimalities so deeply offending our asymptopic sense of entitlement.

The only unpleasantness is coming from everyone dementedly framing themselves in Hell. The only thing we have to rage about is rage itself. That's the dynamic. It's not some certain bad person or group. It's broader than that.

My explanation for the lack of evidence of advanced life in the galaxy is that an idyllic level of wealth, comfort and technological ease makes life forms predisposed to struggle light their hair on fire and go ape shit crazy. Spoiled princesses increasingly vexed by smaller and smaller mattress peas AND WIELDING FLAME-THROWERS. That's how it all ends, pardon the spoiler.

All you need to do is reframe. It starts with you, right here, right now. That's how the center holds.


I didn't move to Portugal to escape the hell. I moved here to escape the priveleged aristocratic ninnies conjuring an imaginary hell by conceiving of themselves as being damned with nothing left to lose.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dear Jim,

I apologize for not following your life and writings for a while. I love you and have always appreaciated your voice.

I think your commets here are spot-on. So many screaming about percieved injustices that TRULY do not affect them in the least. I love to tease my liberal friends in Los Angeles (Silver Lake) by asking them to tell me a single black person they personally know. Often, stony silence.

Joe Posnanski is a good writer and one of my favorite sportswriters. (Part of why I like him is that he looks EXACTLY like a sportswiter from Cleveland named "Joe Posnanski".) He had the misfortune of being in the epicenter of the Penn State football Jerry Sundusky child abuse scandal. He had taken a $6-figure advance to write a biography of Joe Paterno. He had been living with the Paterno family in their house for six months when the scandal broke.

He was very clear in all his reporting that he COULD NOT BE OBJECTIVE. He was trying to report from the eye of the hurricane and was very explicit in saying that he could not objectively judge Joe Paterno, as he had been "embedded" with his family and could not trust his feelings or think objectively about the man himself. For this stance, despite being as clear and honest as possible, he was EXCORIATED, and almost cast out of journalism. He got death threats.

He reported the atmosphere around the crisis as people HOWLING. Howling with pain and rage. He wrote that within the sonic envelope of this HOWLING there could be no thought, only screams. AIR-HORN is another kind of description of this wild public anger that obliterates thought. You must either HOWL with us or you must be an enemy.

Horrible examples of the abuse of children are perhaps the one case where this howling could be justified. Certainly it is understandable -- it's the greatest crime in humanity. But as you have noted, it seems that any slight against the orthodoxy now provokes the same response, the same howling, the same moral outrage that destroys thought. It is the madness of the mob, the French Revolution, all violent religious crusades and purges of history. Princesses and peas indeed.

Thank you.

James Leff said...

Sigh. You’re not going to like this, but irritation is the shameful albatross around the neck of any writer offering counterintuitive observation. And you say you love me, so you surely don’t deserve this. But here goes, anyway. I’m not trying to make you feel bad. Just to reframe.

You’re doing it.

You’re lighting your hair on fire about the people lighting their hair on fire. And that’s not a higher-level process—an unusually broad perspective gone slightly wrong at the end. No, you’re doing the thing. The exact thing. It’s not insightful to note the irrational and flamboyant emotional aggrievement of THOSE PEOPLE. That's easy. But the point is you're remaining perplexing blind to the obvious fact that you are EXTREMELY AGGRIEVED ABOUT THESE EXTREMELY AGGRIEVED PEOPLE.

They’re all a bunch of hypocrites, and THEY ATTACKED YOUR FAVORITE WRITER, and they have no right to complain about injustice if they DON’T HAVE BLACK FRIENDS (what??) and all you see is HOWLING and HOWLIING and HOWLING, to the point where you’re, uh, howling about it.

We are a nation of people exquisitely sensitive to the dysfunction and irrationality and blindness and bellicosity of “them”, and thickly blind to it within “us”, while remaining Helen Motherfucking Keller to it in “me”.

Re-read my take. I’m not lighting my hair on fire. I’m not condemning anyone or anything. I’m not throwing people and their attitudes and their presentation in the trash for being FUCKING IDIOTS. Rather, I’m reminding them they’re living an elevated existence in utopia, and that it’s fine. That’s the chunk you missed. And it’s the only real reality to any of this.

Blog Archive