I decided to test this assumption, and, sure enough, a bit of surfing turned up some harsh words for the following seemingly sacrosanct things. Click for the full rants (I need to stress that the following are not satirical):
The Taj Mahal: "I think that Taj Mahal is a big hype! I have seen grander and more marvelous pieces of architecture in Europe and America than Taj Mahal. Statue of Liberty is more imposing"
Citizen Kane: "It has the aura of the Independent Film Channel about it. That is where you view interesting failed experiments of promising young filmakers"
James Joyce's "Ulysses": "No more than an adolescent playing with styles to no good purpose whatsoever"
Porsche sports cars: "Very over rated and very over priced. There not even good looking"
Miles Davis' "Kind of Blue": "One star for Cannonball Adderly's and Bill Evans' efforts. Otherwise, it is feces hailed as something good"
Mahatma Gandhi: "So erratic and unpredictable that he may have delayed Indian independence for twenty-five years"
Vincent Van Gogh's "Starry Night": "I like the starscape idea, but its not nearly colorful or stylized enough."
2 comments:
What a great colletion of fuss budget comments. Gandhi is my favorite!
I rarely post negative stuff online unless I think the restaurant (or business) is evil or deceitful or completely full of themselves. I tend to only post positive comments, because I want the places that I like and enjoy to continue to prosper. The downside is that I could be mistaken for a shill since nearly all my posts are positive.
Post a Comment