This particularly good xkcd comic is up right now:
The simplicity is what makes it effective, but being as how this is a Slog rather than a comic, I'll fuss it up some for my own version:
5 stars: Has only one review
4.5 stars: Excellent (the 4 star reviews come from people who never rate anything 5 stars)
4 stars: Either excellent or crap, with uncomprehending idiots either over or underrating
1.5 to 3.5 stars: Crap
1 star: Has only one review
("OK" ratings can't be meaningfully demarcated via online rating systems)
This, by the way, is one reason why we never instituted star ratings on Chowhound.
Oh, and if you like this sort of thing, you may enjoy my "Eating by the Numbers" system, which is a surprisingly non-ditzy way to rate food (and other things) on a 1-to-10 scale.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(208)
-
▼
August
(22)
- Some Beers to Try
- Explaining Armstrong
- Dead Malls
- Understanding Online Star Ratings
- The Infinite Potential of Slow Learners
- Home Decor for the Visually Incompetent
- "The Poor"
- A Campaign of Two Half-Libertarians
- Job Creators
- Apple to Set a Precedent of Non-Indispensableness
- Paul Ryan: Fierce Libertarian and Staunch Catholic?
- Ruggiero Ricci: Suggested Listening
- Our Ruggiero Ricci
- Brave Heroes
- Recognizing Pure Id For What it Is
- Gender Segregated Competition
- Give Me That Old Time Olympics
- Whimsy
- No-Fee Change Counting And Human Happiness
- Another Rubber Tree Plant
- Nerds 1, Jocks 0
- Richard Wagner: Pussycat
-
▼
August
(22)
No comments:
Post a Comment