Again and again, I notice that marriages (and other long relationships) are very frequently the opposite of how they appear.
The hapless, loopier-seeming one is usually the rock.
The stoic, competent-seeming one is usually the anguished basket case.
The quiet, gentler one is usually the dominator.
These observations are most reliably true for longer-term relationships (where there's time for roles to settle in - and for outsiders to observe evidence of the true dynamics). But I don't think it's that long-term relationships become like this; it's that relationships like this are the ones which survive to the long term. These dynamics, in other words, appear to be the foundation of compatibility.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(128)
-
▼
May
(11)
- Marriage Paradoxes
- Going Narrow to Go Broad
- The Life-Affirming Power of Superior Sweatpants
- Really Expensive "Drinks and a Bite" Followed by T...
- Food in the 90s, Film in the 70s
- More Great Writing From The Economist's Obituary C...
- List of fallacies
- Seymour Hersh's Sad Decline
- The New Century
- Human Suffering and Scary Movies
- Reheating Chronicles: Griddled Dumplings
-
▼
May
(11)
No comments:
Post a Comment